Lecture 7: Matrix Algebra for Homogeneous Linear Algebraic Systems
Download the original PDF →
7.1 Solving Homogeneous System of Linear Equations
Multicomponent systems result in n n n set(s) of mathematical equations that must be solved simultaneously. It can be represented by the following matrix format: [ C ] { X } = { B } [C]\{X\} = \{B\} [ C ] { X } = { B } . If { B } = { 0 } \{B\} = \{0\} { B } = { 0 } , it is known as homogeneous system of linear equations.
(i) In this study, methods used to solve the total solution of { X } \{X\} { X } by using the [ C ] [C] [ C ] & zero { B } \{B\} { B } is out of scope .
Linear Algebraic Equations Coefficient Matrix, [ C ] [C] [ C ] Unknown, { X } \{X\} { X } Zero { B } \{B\} { B } 0.5 x 1 + 2.5 x 2 − 9 x 3 = 0 0.5x_1 + 2.5x_2 - 9x_3 = 0 0.5 x 1 + 2.5 x 2 − 9 x 3 = 0 − 4.5 x 1 + 3.5 x 2 − 2 x 3 = 0 -4.5x_1 + 3.5x_2 - 2x_3 = 0 − 4.5 x 1 + 3.5 x 2 − 2 x 3 = 0 − 8 x 1 − 9 x 2 + 22 x 3 = 0 -8x_1 - 9x_2 + 22x_3 = 0 − 8 x 1 − 9 x 2 + 22 x 3 = 0 n = 3 n=3 n = 3 where 3 sets of eqns. are given to solve x 1 x_1 x 1 , x 2 x_2 x 2 and x 3 x_3 x 3 respectively.[ 0.5 2.5 − 9 − 4.5 3.5 − 2 − 8 − 9 22 ] \begin{bmatrix} 0.5 & 2.5 & -9 \\ -4.5 & 3.5 & -2 \\ -8 & -9 & 22 \end{bmatrix} 0.5 − 4.5 − 8 2.5 3.5 − 9 − 9 − 2 22 { x 1 x 2 x 3 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ { 0 0 0 } \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
Depending on the coefficient matrix that represents any physical system or application.
If ∣ C ∣ = 0 |C| = 0 ∣ C ∣ = 0 & { B } = { 0 } \{B\} = \{0\} { B } = { 0 } , then the solutions of { X } \{X\} { X } due to initial/boundary conditions are non-zero/ non-trivial.
If ∣ C ∣ ≠ 0 |C| \neq 0 ∣ C ∣ = 0 & { B } = { 0 } \{B\} = \{0\} { B } = { 0 } , then the solutions of { X } \{X\} { X } due to initial/boundary conditions are zero/ trivial.
(ii) In this study, the main focus is to find the characteristic of the system in terms of the eigenvalue, λ i \lambda_i λ i & the corresponding eigenvector, { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ i \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda_i} ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ i where i = 1 , 2 , … , n mode i = 1,2, \dots, n\ \textit{mode} i = 1 , 2 , … , n mode . This is known as eigenvalue/eigenvector problem.
[ A ] { x } i = [ λ i ] { x } i [A]\{x\}_i = [\lambda_i]\{x\}_i [ A ] { x } i = [ λ i ] { x } i
( [ A ] − λ i [ I ] ) { x } i = { 0 } ([A] - \lambda_i[I])\{x\}_i = \{0\} ([ A ] − λ i [ I ]) { x } i = { 0 }
where λ i \lambda_i λ i is one of the eigenvalue of the matrix [A] ;
{ x } i \{x\}_i { x } i is the corresponding eigenvector for each λ i \lambda_i λ i and { x } i ≠ { 0 } \{x\}_i \neq \{0\} { x } i = { 0 } , i.e. non-trivial solutions;
[ I ] [I] [ I ] = identity matrix
Note: In general, n n n dof system has n n n number of eigenvalue & eigenvector. For example: 2 dof mass-spring system has 2 eigenvalues and 2 eigenvectors, while 3 dof electrical circuit system has 3 eigenvalues and 3 eigenvectors.
7.2 Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem
Example: Link the eigenvalue and eigenvector to the characteristic of the given system.
Given stiffness , k = k 1 = k 2 = 200 N/m k = k_1 = k_2 = 200\text{ N/m} k = k 1 = k 2 = 200 N/m ;
mass , m = m 1 = m 2 = 40 kg m = m_1 = m_2 = 40\text{ kg} m = m 1 = m 2 = 40 kg
The equations of motion of the 2 mass spring systems are provided:
− k x 1 − k ( x 1 − x 2 ) = m 1 x ¨ 1 -kx_1 - k(x_1 - x_2) = m_1\ddot{x}_1 − k x 1 − k ( x 1 − x 2 ) = m 1 x ¨ 1
k ( x 1 − x 2 ) − k x 2 = m 2 x ¨ 2 k(x_1 - x_2) - kx_2 = m_2\ddot{x}_2 k ( x 1 − x 2 ) − k x 2 = m 2 x ¨ 2
where x 1 = A 1 sin ( ω t + θ 1 ) , x ¨ 1 = − ω 2 x 1 \text{where } x_1 = A_1\sin(\omega t + \theta_1) \ , \quad \ddot{x}_1 = -\omega^2x_1 where x 1 = A 1 sin ( ω t + θ 1 ) , x ¨ 1 = − ω 2 x 1
x 2 = A 2 sin ( ω t + θ 2 ) , x ¨ 2 = − ω 2 x 2 x_2 = A_2\sin(\omega t + \theta_2) \ , \quad \ddot{x}_2 = -\omega^2x_2 x 2 = A 2 sin ( ω t + θ 2 ) , x ¨ 2 = − ω 2 x 2
[ 2 k m 1 − ω 2 − k m 1 − k m 2 2 k m 2 − ω 2 ] { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{2k}{m_1} - \omega^2 & -\dfrac{k}{m_1} \\ -\dfrac{k}{m_2} & \dfrac{2k}{m_2} - \omega^2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} m 1 2 k − ω 2 − m 2 k − m 1 k m 2 2 k − ω 2 { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 }
Note: The derivation of the eqns involves theory of vibration, thus it is not examined in this study.
[ 10 − ω 2 − 5 − 5 10 − ω 2 ] { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} 10 - \omega^2 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \omega^2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} [ 10 − ω 2 − 5 − 5 10 − ω 2 ] { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 }
( [ 10 − 5 − 5 10 ] − ω 2 [ 1 0 0 1 ] ) { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 } \left(\begin{bmatrix} 10 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 \end{bmatrix} - \omega^2\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\right)\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} ( [ 10 − 5 − 5 10 ] − ω 2 [ 1 0 0 1 ] ) { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 }
[ 10 − 5 − 5 10 ] { x 1 x 2 } − ω 2 { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} 10 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} - \omega^2\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} [ 10 − 5 − 5 10 ] { x 1 x 2 } − ω 2 { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 }
[ 10 − 5 − 5 10 ] { x 1 x 2 } = ω 2 { x 1 x 2 } \begin{bmatrix} 10 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \omega^2\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} [ 10 − 5 − 5 10 ] { x 1 x 2 } = ω 2 { x 1 x 2 }
( [ A ] − λ i [ I ] ) { x } i = { 0 } ([A] - \lambda_i[I])\{x\}_i = \{0\} ([ A ] − λ i [ I ]) { x } i = { 0 }
[ A 11 − λ m o d e i A 12 A 21 A 22 − λ m o d e i ] { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i = { 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} A_{11} - \lambda_{mode\ i} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} - \lambda_{mode\ i} \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} [ A 11 − λ m o d e i A 21 A 12 A 22 − λ m o d e i ] { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i = { 0 0 }
( [ A 11 A 12 A 21 A 22 ] − λ m o d e i [ 1 0 0 1 ] ) { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i = { 0 0 } \left(\begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{bmatrix} - \lambda_{mode\ i}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\right)\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} ( [ A 11 A 21 A 12 A 22 ] − λ m o d e i [ 1 0 0 1 ] ) { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i = { 0 0 }
[ A 11 A 12 A 21 A 22 ] { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i − λ m o d e i { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i = { 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} - \lambda_{mode\ i}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} [ A 11 A 21 A 12 A 22 ] { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i − λ m o d e i { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i = { 0 0 }
[ A 11 A 12 A 21 A 22 ] { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i = λ m o d e i { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i \begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} = \lambda_{mode\ i}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} [ A 11 A 21 A 12 A 22 ] { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i = λ m o d e i { x 1 x 2 } m o d e i
By comparing the general formulation of the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem,
[ A ] { x } i = [ λ i ] { x } i [A]\{x\}_i = [\lambda_i]\{x\}_i [ A ] { x } i = [ λ i ] { x } i
We find that the coefficient matrix, [ A ] = [ 10 − 5 − 5 10 ] [A] = \begin{bmatrix} 10 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 \end{bmatrix} [ A ] = [ 10 − 5 − 5 10 ]
Eigenvalue, [ λ i ] = ω 2 [\lambda_i] = \omega^2 [ λ i ] = ω 2 where ω \omega ω = natural frequency of the system
Eigenvector, { x } i = { x 1 x 2 } \{x\}_i = \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} { x } i = { x 1 x 2 } = mode shape of the system (i.e. pattern of the maximum vibration amplitude) at the corresponding i i i th mode/ case
Note: Natural frequency and mode shape are important characteristics for a vibration system that can be obtained from the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem.
Example: Solving the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem.
[ 10 − ω 2 − 5 − 5 10 − ω 2 ] { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} 10 - \omega^2 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \omega^2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} [ 10 − ω 2 − 5 − 5 10 − ω 2 ] { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 }
To have non-trivial solution, { x 1 x 2 } ≠ { 0 0 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} \neq \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 } . The determinant must be zero.
∣ 10 − ω 2 − 5 − 5 10 − ω 2 ∣ = 0 \begin{vmatrix} 10 - \omega^2 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \omega^2 \end{vmatrix} = 0 10 − ω 2 − 5 − 5 10 − ω 2 = 0
Let the eigenvalue, λ = ω 2 \lambda = \omega^2 λ = ω 2
∣ 10 − λ − 5 − 5 10 − λ ∣ = 0 \begin{vmatrix} 10 - \lambda & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \lambda \end{vmatrix} = 0 10 − λ − 5 − 5 10 − λ = 0
λ 2 − 20 λ + 75 = 0 Note: This is known as characteristic equation . \lambda^2 - 20\lambda + 75 = 0 \qquad \text{Note: This is known as } \textbf{characteristic equation}. λ 2 − 20 λ + 75 = 0 Note: This is known as characteristic equation .
We obtain 2 eigenvalues for the 2 mass spring system: λ 1 = 5 \lambda_1 = 5 λ 1 = 5 and λ 2 = 15 \lambda_2 = 15 λ 2 = 15
Hint: Common practice is to arrange λ i \lambda_i λ i in ascending order, i.e. λ 1 < λ 2 \lambda_1 < \lambda_2 λ 1 < λ 2
Since λ = ω 2 \lambda = \omega^2 λ = ω 2 , we can obtain the natural frequencies for the system: ω 1 = 5 \omega_1 = \sqrt{5} ω 1 = 5 and ω 2 = 15 \omega_2 = \sqrt{15} ω 2 = 15
At mode 1, ω 1 = 5 \omega_1 = \sqrt{5} ω 1 = 5 or λ 1 = 5 \lambda_1 = 5 λ 1 = 5 , we obtain the unscaled eigenvector as following:
[ 5 − 5 − 5 5 ] { x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 0 0 } → expand 5 x 1 − 5 x 2 = 0 − 5 x 1 + 5 x 2 = 0 → x 1 = 1 , x 2 = 1 for both eqns { x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 1 1 } \begin{bmatrix} 5 & -5 \\ -5 & 5 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} \quad \xrightarrow{\text{expand}} \quad \begin{gathered} 5x_1 - 5x_2 = 0 \\ -5x_1 + 5x_2 = 0 \end{gathered} \quad \xrightarrow{x_1 = 1,\ x_2 = 1 \text{ for both eqns}} \quad \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} [ 5 − 5 − 5 5 ] { x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 0 0 } expand 5 x 1 − 5 x 2 = 0 − 5 x 1 + 5 x 2 = 0 x 1 = 1 , x 2 = 1 for both eqns { x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 1 1 }
Unscaled eigenvector for mode #1 at ω 1 = 5 \omega_1 = \sqrt{5} ω 1 = 5
{ x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 1 1 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 1 1 } means that the maximum vibration of x 1 x_1 x 1 will be in phase with x 2 x_2 x 2 , where both masses move to +x direction by one unit to the right at same time.
Unscaled eigenvector for mode #1 at ω 1 = 5 \omega_1 = \sqrt{5} ω 1 = 5
{ x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 5 5 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 5 \\ 5 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 5 5 } is also an acceptable unscaled eigenvector answer. The most important point is eigenvector tells the unique shape/ vibration pattern at each mode regardless of the scale. In general, all acceptable solutions of eigenvector are called eigenspace , i.e. { x 1 x 2 } 1 = t { 1 1 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = t\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 x 2 } 1 = t { 1 1 } , where − ∞ ≤ t ≤ ∞ -\infty \leq t \leq \infty − ∞ ≤ t ≤ ∞ .
Normalized eigenvector has unique shape and unique scale by using the following formula:
{ x 1 , s c a l e x 2 , s c a l e } 1 = 1 magnitude { x 1 , u n s c a l e x 2 , u n s c a l e } 1 = ± 1 1 2 + 1 2 { 1 1 } = ± 1 5 2 + 5 2 { 5 5 } = ± { 0.707 0.707 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_{1,scale} \\ x_{2,scale} \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \frac{1}{\text{magnitude}\begin{Bmatrix} x_{1,unscale} \\ x_{2,unscale} \end{Bmatrix}_1} = \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{1^2 + 1^2}}\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} = \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{5^2 + 5^2}}\begin{Bmatrix} 5 \\ 5 \end{Bmatrix} = \pm\begin{Bmatrix} 0.707 \\ 0.707 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 , sc a l e x 2 , sc a l e } 1 = magnitude { x 1 , u n sc a l e x 2 , u n sc a l e } 1 1 = ± 1 2 + 1 2 1 { 1 1 } = ± 5 2 + 5 2 1 { 5 5 } = ± { 0.707 0.707 }
At mode 2, ω 2 = 15 \omega_2 = \sqrt{15} ω 2 = 15 or λ 2 = 15 \lambda_2 = 15 λ 2 = 15 , we obtain the unscaled eigenvector as following:
[ − 5 − 5 − 5 − 5 ] { x 1 x 2 } 2 = { 0 0 } → expand − 5 x 1 − 5 x 2 = 0 − 5 x 1 − 5 x 2 = 0 → x 1 = 1 , x 2 = − 1 for both eqns { x 1 x 2 } 2 = { 1 − 1 } \begin{bmatrix} -5 & -5 \\ -5 & -5 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} \quad \xrightarrow{\text{expand}} \quad \begin{gathered} -5x_1 - 5x_2 = 0 \\ -5x_1 - 5x_2 = 0 \end{gathered} \quad \xrightarrow{x_1 = 1,\ x_2 = -1 \text{ for both eqns}} \quad \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix} [ − 5 − 5 − 5 − 5 ] { x 1 x 2 } 2 = { 0 0 } expand − 5 x 1 − 5 x 2 = 0 − 5 x 1 − 5 x 2 = 0 x 1 = 1 , x 2 = − 1 for both eqns { x 1 x 2 } 2 = { 1 − 1 }
Unscaled eigenvector for mode #2 at ω 2 = 15 \omega_2 = \sqrt{15} ω 2 = 15
{ x 1 x 2 } 2 = { 1 − 1 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 x 2 } 2 = { 1 − 1 } means that at ω 2 = 15 r a d s − 1 \omega_2 = \sqrt{15}\ rad\,s^{-1} ω 2 = 15 r a d s − 1 , the maximum vibration of x 1 x_1 x 1 will be out of phase with x 2 x_2 x 2 , where one mass moves to +x direction while other to -x direction at same time.
Eigenspace for mode #2
{ x 1 x 2 } 2 = t { 1 − 1 } , where − ∞ ≤ t ≤ ∞ . \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = t\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix} \ , \text{ where } -\infty \leq t \leq \infty. { x 1 x 2 } 2 = t { 1 − 1 } , where − ∞ ≤ t ≤ ∞.
Normalized eigenvector for mode #2
{ x 1 , s c a l e x 2 , s c a l e } 2 = 1 magnitude { x 1 , u n s c a l e x 2 , u n s c a l e } 2 = ± 1 1 2 + 1 2 { 1 − 1 } = ± { 0.707 − 0.707 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_{1,scale} \\ x_{2,scale} \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \frac{1}{\text{magnitude}\begin{Bmatrix} x_{1,unscale} \\ x_{2,unscale} \end{Bmatrix}_2} = \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{1^2 + 1^2}}\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix} = \pm\begin{Bmatrix} 0.707 \\ -0.707 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 , sc a l e x 2 , sc a l e } 2 = magnitude { x 1 , u n sc a l e x 2 , u n sc a l e } 2 1 = ± 1 2 + 1 2 1 { 1 − 1 } = ± { 0.707 − 0.707 }
Note: Depending on questions, student should know how to find unscaled eigenvector/ eigenspace/ normalized eigenvector. In general, if it is not stated for manual calculation , then providing unscaled eigenvector (t = 1 t = 1 t = 1 ) is sufficient. For software calculation , normalised eigenvector is used usually.
Visualisation of the eigenvalue & eigenvector information:
Mode 1/ Case 1 Mode 2/ Case 2 Eigenvalue, λ 1 = 5 \lambda_1 = 5 λ 1 = 5 Natural frequency, ω 1 = 5 \omega_1 = \sqrt{5} ω 1 = 5 (Lower frequency) Unscaled eigenvector (also called mode shape),{ x 1 x 2 } 1 = ± { 1 1 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \pm\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 x 2 } 1 = ± { 1 1 } λ 2 = 15 \lambda_2 = 15 λ 2 = 15 ω 2 = 15 \omega_2 = \sqrt{15} ω 2 = 15 (Higher frequency){ x 1 x 2 } 2 = ± { 1 − 1 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \pm\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 x 2 } 2 = ± { 1 − 1 }
Hint: Period = 1/ Frequency = 2 π / ω 2\pi/\omega 2 π / ω
Example: Find the eigenvalues & eigenvectors of the following matrix.
A = [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] \mathbf{A} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix} A = 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4
Eigenvalues/eigenvectors problem: ( A − λ I ) x = 0 \qquad (\mathbf{A} - \lambda\mathbf{I})\boldsymbol{x} = \mathbf{0} ( A − λ I ) x = 0
( [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] − λ [ 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ] ) { x 1 x 2 x 3 } = { 0 0 0 } \left(\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix} - \lambda\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\right)\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4 − λ 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
[ 1 − λ − 3 3 3 − 5 − λ 3 6 − 6 4 − λ ] { x 1 x 2 x 3 } = { 0 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} 1 - \lambda & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 - \lambda & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 - \lambda \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} 1 − λ 3 6 − 3 − 5 − λ − 6 3 3 4 − λ ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
Since { x 1 x 2 x 3 } ≠ { 0 0 0 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} \neq \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ , ∣ 1 − λ − 3 3 3 − 5 − λ 3 6 − 6 4 − λ ∣ = 0 \qquad \begin{vmatrix} 1 - \lambda & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 - \lambda & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 - \lambda \end{vmatrix} = 0 1 − λ 3 6 − 3 − 5 − λ − 6 3 3 4 − λ = 0
( 1 − λ ) [ ( − 5 − λ ) ( 4 − λ ) − 3 ( − 6 ) ] − ( − 3 ) [ 3 ( 4 − λ ) − 3 ( 6 ) ] + 3 [ 3 ( − 6 ) − ( − 5 − λ ) ( 6 ) ] = 0 (1 - \lambda)\left[(-5 - \lambda)(4 - \lambda) - 3(-6)\right] - (-3)\left[3(4 - \lambda) - 3(6)\right] + 3\left[3(-6) - (-5 - \lambda)(6)\right] = 0 ( 1 − λ ) [ ( − 5 − λ ) ( 4 − λ ) − 3 ( − 6 ) ] − ( − 3 ) [ 3 ( 4 − λ ) − 3 ( 6 ) ] + 3 [ 3 ( − 6 ) − ( − 5 − λ ) ( 6 ) ] = 0
Characteristic eqn: λ 3 − 12 λ − 16 = 0 \qquad \lambda^3 - 12\lambda - 16 = 0 λ 3 − 12 λ − 16 = 0
( λ − 4 ) ( λ 2 + 4 λ + 4 ) = 0 (\lambda - 4)(\lambda^2 + 4\lambda + 4) = 0 ( λ − 4 ) ( λ 2 + 4 λ + 4 ) = 0
λ 1 = − 2 , λ 2 = − 2 (Repeated eigenvalue case) , λ 3 = 4 \lambda_1 = -2 \ , \lambda_2 = -2 \text{ (Repeated eigenvalue case)}, \lambda_3 = 4 λ 1 = − 2 , λ 2 = − 2 (Repeated eigenvalue case) , λ 3 = 4
Case 1: λ 1 = − 2 \lambda_1 = -2 λ 1 = − 2 , Case 2: λ 2 = − 2 \lambda_2 = -2 λ 2 = − 2 (Repeated eigenvalue case)
[ 3 − 3 3 3 − 3 3 6 − 6 6 ] { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ = − 2 = { 0 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} 3 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -3 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 6 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = -2} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} 3 3 6 − 3 − 3 − 6 3 3 6 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ = − 2 = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
→ augmented [ 1 − 1 1 0 3 − 3 3 0 6 − 6 6 0 ] \xrightarrow{\text{augmented}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 3 & -3 & 3 & 0 \\ 6 & -6 & 6 & 0 \end{array}\right] augmented 1 3 6 − 1 − 3 − 6 1 3 6 0 0 0
→ R 1 → R 1 3 scale pivot element to 1 [ 1 − 1 1 0 3 − 3 3 0 6 − 6 6 0 ] \xrightarrow[R_1 \to \frac{R_1}{3}]{\text{scale pivot element to 1}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 3 & -3 & 3 & 0 \\ 6 & -6 & 6 & 0 \end{array}\right] scale pivot element to 1 R 1 → 3 R 1 1 3 6 − 1 − 3 − 6 1 3 6 0 0 0
→ R 2 → R 2 − 3 R 1 , R 3 → R 3 − 6 R 1 Forward elimination [ 1 − 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] Note: RREF shows rank 1 (i.e. 1 linearly independent vector) \xrightarrow[R_2 \to R_2 - 3R_1,\ R_3 \to R_3 - 6R_1]{\text{Forward elimination}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \qquad \text{Note: RREF shows rank 1 (i.e. 1 linearly independent vector)} Forward elimination R 2 → R 2 − 3 R 1 , R 3 → R 3 − 6 R 1 1 0 0 − 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Note: RREF shows rank 1 (i.e. 1 linearly independent vector)
x 1 − x 2 + x 3 = 0 x_1 - x_2 + x_3 = 0 x 1 − x 2 + x 3 = 0
x 1 = x 2 − x 3 x_1 = x_2 - x_3 x 1 = x 2 − x 3
Eigenspace for { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ = − 2 = { x 2 − x 3 x 2 x 3 } = { x 2 x 2 0 } + { − x 3 0 x 3 } = t { 1 1 0 } ∣ x 2 = t + s { − 1 0 1 } ∣ x 3 = s , where t & s ∈ R \textit{Eigenspace for } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = -2} = \begin{Bmatrix} x_2 - x_3 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} x_2 \\ x_2 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} + \begin{Bmatrix} -x_3 \\ 0 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = t\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}\Bigg|_{x_2 = t} + s\begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\Bigg|_{x_3 = s} \ , \text{where } t \ \& \ s \in \mathbf{R} Eigenspace for ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ = − 2 = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 2 − x 3 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 2 x 2 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ + ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ − x 3 0 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = t ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 1 1 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ x 2 = t + s ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ − 1 0 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ x 3 = s , where t & s ∈ R
Eigenvectors, { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ = − 2 = { 1 1 0 } & { − 1 0 1 } for repeated eigenvalues λ 1 = − 2 , λ 2 = − 2 respectively. \textit{Eigenvectors, } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = -2} = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} \ \& \ \begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} \text{ for repeated eigenvalues } \lambda_1 = -2 \ , \lambda_2 = -2 \text{ respectively.} Eigenvectors, ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ = − 2 = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 1 1 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ & ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ − 1 0 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ for repeated eigenvalues λ 1 = − 2 , λ 2 = − 2 respectively.
Case 3: λ 3 = 4 \lambda_3 = 4 λ 3 = 4 (Distinct eigenvalue case)
[ − 3 − 3 3 3 − 9 3 6 − 6 0 ] { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ = 4 = { 0 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} -3 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -9 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 0 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = 4} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} − 3 3 6 − 3 − 9 − 6 3 3 0 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ = 4 = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
→ augmented [ − 3 − 3 3 0 3 − 9 3 0 6 − 6 0 0 ] \xrightarrow{\text{augmented}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} -3 & -3 & 3 & 0 \\ 3 & -9 & 3 & 0 \\ 6 & -6 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] augmented − 3 3 6 − 3 − 9 − 6 3 3 0 0 0 0
→ R 1 → − R 1 3 scale pivot element to 1 [ 1 1 − 1 0 3 − 9 3 0 6 − 6 0 0 ] \xrightarrow[R_1 \to -\frac{R_1}{3}]{\text{scale pivot element to 1}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 3 & -9 & 3 & 0 \\ 6 & -6 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] scale pivot element to 1 R 1 → − 3 R 1 1 3 6 1 − 9 − 6 − 1 3 0 0 0 0
→ R 2 → R 2 − 3 R 1 , R 3 → R 3 − 6 R 1 Forward elimination [ 1 1 − 1 0 0 − 12 6 0 0 − 12 6 0 ] \xrightarrow[R_2 \to R_2 - 3R_1,\ R_3 \to R_3 - 6R_1]{\text{Forward elimination}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & -12 & 6 & 0 \\ 0 & -12 & 6 & 0 \end{array}\right] Forward elimination R 2 → R 2 − 3 R 1 , R 3 → R 3 − 6 R 1 1 0 0 1 − 12 − 12 − 1 6 6 0 0 0
→ R 2 → − R 2 12 scale pivot element to 1 [ 1 1 − 1 0 0 1 − 1 2 0 0 − 12 6 0 ] \xrightarrow[R_2 \to -\frac{R_2}{12}]{\text{scale pivot element to 1}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 0 & -12 & 6 & 0 \end{array}\right] scale pivot element to 1 R 2 → − 12 R 2 1 0 0 1 1 − 12 − 1 − 2 1 6 0 0 0
→ R 3 → R 3 + 12 R 2 Forward elimination [ 1 1 − 1 0 0 1 − 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 ] \xrightarrow[R_3 \to R_3 + 12R_2]{\text{Forward elimination}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] Forward elimination R 3 → R 3 + 12 R 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 − 1 − 2 1 0 0 0 0
→ R 1 → R 1 − R 2 Forward elimination [ 1 0 − 1 2 0 0 1 − 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 ] Note: RREF shows rank 2 (i.e. 2 linearly independent vectors) \xrightarrow[R_1 \to R_1 - R_2]{\text{Forward elimination}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \qquad \text{Note: RREF shows rank 2 (i.e. 2 linearly independent vectors)} Forward elimination R 1 → R 1 − R 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 − 2 1 − 2 1 0 0 0 0 Note: RREF shows rank 2 (i.e. 2 linearly independent vectors)
x 1 − 1 2 x 3 = 0 > > x 1 = 1 2 x 3 x_1 - \frac{1}{2}x_3 = 0 \quad >> \quad x_1 = \frac{1}{2}x_3 x 1 − 2 1 x 3 = 0 >> x 1 = 2 1 x 3
x 2 − 1 2 x 3 = 0 > > x 2 = 1 2 x 3 x_2 - \frac{1}{2}x_3 = 0 \quad >> \quad x_2 = \frac{1}{2}x_3 x 2 − 2 1 x 3 = 0 >> x 2 = 2 1 x 3
Eigenspace for { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ = 4 = { 1 2 x 3 1 2 x 3 x 3 } = t { 1 2 1 2 1 } ∣ x 3 = t , where t ∈ R \textit{Eigenspace for } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = 4} = \begin{Bmatrix} \frac{1}{2}x_3 \\ \frac{1}{2}x_3 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = t\begin{Bmatrix} \frac{1}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\Bigg|_{x_3 = t} \ , \text{where } t \in \mathbf{R} Eigenspace for ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ = 4 = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 2 1 x 3 2 1 x 3 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = t ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 2 1 2 1 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ x 3 = t , where t ∈ R
Eigenvector, { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ = 4 = { 0.5 0.5 1 } \textit{Eigenvector, } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = 4} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0.5 \\ 0.5 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} Eigenvector, ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ = 4 = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0.5 0.5 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
For verification of the eigenvector results, it should satisfy the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem:
[ A ] { x } i = [ λ i ] { x } i [A]\{x\}_i = [\lambda_i]\{x\}_i [ A ] { x } i = [ λ i ] { x } i
Case 1 (λ = − 2 \lambda = -2 λ = − 2 ) Case 2 (λ = − 2 \lambda = -2 λ = − 2 ) Case 3 (λ = 4 \lambda = 4 λ = 4 ) [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] { 1 1 0 } = − 2 { 1 1 0 } \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} = -2\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 1 1 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = − 2 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 1 1 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] { − 1 0 1 } = − 2 { − 1 0 1 } \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} = -2\begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ − 1 0 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = − 2 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ − 1 0 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] { 0.5 0.5 1 } = 4 { 0.5 0.5 1 } \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} 0.5 \\ 0.5 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} = 4\begin{Bmatrix} 0.5 \\ 0.5 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0.5 0.5 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = 4 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0.5 0.5 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
Or we can combine all cases into single matrix operation:
Eigenvector/ Modal matrix consists of all eigenvectors, P \mathbf{P} P Eigenvalue/ Spectral matrix consists of all eigenvalues, D \mathbf{D} D Verification of Eigenvalue/ Eigenvector Problem for All Cases P \mathbf{P} P or [ P ] [P] [ P ] = [ { x 1 x 2 x 3 } 1 { x 1 x 2 x 3 } 2 { x 1 x 2 x 3 } 3 ] = \left[\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_1 \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_2 \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_3\right] = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ 1 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ 2 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ 3 = [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 where{ x 1 x 2 x 3 } 1 = eigenvector #1 \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \textit{eigenvector \#1} ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ 1 = eigenvector #1 D \mathbf{D} D or [ D ] [D] [ D ] = [ λ 1 0 0 0 λ 2 0 0 0 λ 3 ] = \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_3 \end{bmatrix} = λ 1 0 0 0 λ 2 0 0 0 λ 3 = [ − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4 ] = \begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix} = − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4 whereλ 1 = eigenvalue #1 \lambda_1 = \textit{eigenvalue \#1} λ 1 = eigenvalue #1 [ A ] { x } i = [ λ i ] { x } i → extend [A]\{x\}_i = [\lambda_i]\{x\}_i \xrightarrow{\text{extend}} [ A ] { x } i = [ λ i ] { x } i extend [ A ] [ P ] = [ P ] [ D ] [A][P] = [P][D] [ A ] [ P ] = [ P ] [ D ] [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] = [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] [ − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4 ] \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix} 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 = 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4 = − 2 [ 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ] − 2 [ 0 − 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ] + 4 [ 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.5 0 0 1 ] = -2\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} -2\begin{bmatrix} 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} + 4\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = − 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 − 1 0 1 0 0 0 + 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 1 ∴ \therefore ∴ Since LHS = RHS, [ P ] [P] [ P ] and [ D ] [D] [ D ] are verified.
7.3 Engineering Application of Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem
(a) Diagonalization
Eigenvectors are useful to diagonalize a square matrix:
D = P − 1 A P \mathbf{D} = \mathbf{P}^{-1}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{P} D = P − 1 AP if ∣ P ∣ ≠ 0 |\mathbf{P}| \neq 0 ∣ P ∣ = 0 where P = \mathbf{P} = P = full rank eigenvector or modal matrix
Previously, eigenvalues/eigenvectors problem: ( A − λ I ) x = 0 \qquad (\mathbf{A} - \lambda\mathbf{I})\boldsymbol{x} = \mathbf{0} ( A − λ I ) x = 0
A = [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] → [ 1 − λ − 3 3 3 − 5 − λ 3 6 − 6 4 − λ ] { x 1 x 2 x 3 } = { 0 0 0 } \mathbf{A} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix} \rightarrow \begin{bmatrix} 1 - \lambda & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 - \lambda & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 - \lambda \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} A = 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4 → 1 − λ 3 6 − 3 − 5 − λ − 6 3 3 4 − λ ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
Eigenvectors, { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ = − 2 = { 1 1 0 } & { − 1 0 1 } \textit{Eigenvectors, } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = -2} = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} \ \& \ \begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} Eigenvectors, ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ = − 2 = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 1 1 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ & ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ − 1 0 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
Eigenvector, { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ = 4 = { 0.5 0.5 1 } \textit{Eigenvector, } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = 4} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0.5 \\ 0.5 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} Eigenvector, ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ = 4 = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0.5 0.5 1 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
∴ Eigenvector matrix consists of all eigenvectors, P = [ { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ 1 { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ 2 { x 1 x 2 x 3 } λ 3 ] = [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] \therefore \textit{Eigenvector matrix consists of all eigenvectors, } \mathbf{P} = \left[\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda_1} \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda_2} \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda_3}\right] = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} ∴ Eigenvector matrix consists of all eigenvectors, P = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ 1 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ 2 ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ λ 3 = 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1
D = P − 1 A P = [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] − 1 [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] = [ − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4 ] \mathbf{D} = \mathbf{P}^{-1}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{P} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}^{-1}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix} D = P − 1 AP = 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 − 1 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 = − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4
Note: We can convert a non-diagonal matrix A \mathbf{A} A to a diagonal matrix, where the diagonal matrix, D \mathbf{D} D consists of the eigenvalues of matrix A \mathbf{A} A at the diagonal elements. λ 1 = − 2 , λ 2 = − 2 , λ 3 = 4 \lambda_1 = -2 \ , \lambda_2 = -2, \lambda_3 = 4 λ 1 = − 2 , λ 2 = − 2 , λ 3 = 4
(b) Extension from Diagonalization
D = P − 1 A P \mathbf{D} = \mathbf{P}^{-1}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{P} D = P − 1 AP
A = P D P − 1 \mathbf{A} = \mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}\mathbf{P}^{-1} A = PD P − 1
,where A \mathbf{A} A can be expressed in terms of the eigenvector matrix, P \mathbf{P} P and eigenvalue matrix, D \mathbf{D} D
A 2 = A A = ( P D P − 1 ) ( P D P − 1 ) = ( P D 2 P − 1 ) where P − 1 P = I \mathbf{A}^2 = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{A} = (\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}\mathbf{P}^{-1})(\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}\mathbf{P}^{-1}) = (\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^2\mathbf{P}^{-1}) \qquad \text{where } \mathbf{P}^{-1}\mathbf{P} = \mathbf{I} A 2 = AA = ( PD P − 1 ) ( PD P − 1 ) = ( P D 2 P − 1 ) where P − 1 P = I
A 3 = A 2 A = ( P D 2 P − 1 ) ( P D P − 1 ) = ( P D 3 P − 1 ) \mathbf{A}^3 = \mathbf{A}^2\mathbf{A} = (\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^2\mathbf{P}^{-1})(\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}\mathbf{P}^{-1}) = (\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^3\mathbf{P}^{-1}) A 3 = A 2 A = ( P D 2 P − 1 ) ( PD P − 1 ) = ( P D 3 P − 1 )
⋮ \vdots ⋮
A k = P D k P − 1 where D k = [ λ 1 0 0 0 λ 2 0 0 0 λ 3 ] k = [ λ 1 k 0 0 0 λ 2 k 0 0 0 λ 3 k ] , where k ∈ R \mathbf{A}^k = \mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^k\mathbf{P}^{-1} \qquad \text{where } \mathbf{D}^k = \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_3 \end{bmatrix}^k = \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_1^k & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2^k & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_3^k \end{bmatrix} \ , \text{where } k \in \mathbf{R} A k = P D k P − 1 where D k = λ 1 0 0 0 λ 2 0 0 0 λ 3 k = λ 1 k 0 0 0 λ 2 k 0 0 0 λ 3 k , where k ∈ R
(Comment: power of a diagonal matrix can be computed easily!)
Note: This formula implies that change of power of A \mathbf{A} A will change the eigenvalue matrix while remain the eigenvector matrix, If A \mathbf{A} A has eigenvalues of λ 1 , λ 2 , λ 3 \lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3 λ 1 , λ 2 , λ 3 . Then, A k \mathbf{A}^k A k has eigenvalues of λ 1 k , λ 2 k , λ 3 k \lambda_1^k, \lambda_2^k, \lambda_3^k λ 1 k , λ 2 k , λ 3 k . e.g. A − 1 \mathbf{A}^{-1} A − 1 has eigenvalues of 1 λ 1 , 1 λ 2 , 1 λ 3 \dfrac{1}{\lambda_1}, \dfrac{1}{\lambda_2}, \dfrac{1}{\lambda_3} λ 1 1 , λ 2 1 , λ 3 1 .
You can find A k \mathbf{A}^k A k (power of a matrix) with the eigenvalue & eigenvector matrix by using this formula.
A = [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] ; Eigenvalue matrix, D = [ − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4 ] ; Eigenvector matrix, P = [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] \mathbf{A} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix} \ ; \quad \text{Eigenvalue matrix, } \mathbf{D} = \begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix} ; \quad \text{Eigenvector matrix, } \mathbf{P} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} A = 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4 ; Eigenvalue matrix, D = − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4 ; Eigenvector matrix, P = 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1
A 100 = P D 100 P − 1 = [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] [ − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4 ] 100 [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] − 1 = [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] [ ( − 2 ) 100 0 0 0 ( − 2 ) 100 0 0 0 ( 4 ) 100 ] [ 1 − 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 0 1 1 ] − 1 = 10 60 × [ 0.8035 − 0.8035 0.8035 0.8035 − 0.8035 0.8035 1.6069 − 1.6069 1.6069 ] \begin{aligned}
\mathbf{A}^{100} = \mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^{100}\mathbf{P}^{-1} &= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix}^{100}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}^{-1} \\
&= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} (-2)^{100} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & (-2)^{100} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & (4)^{100} \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}^{-1} \\
&= 10^{60} \times \begin{bmatrix} 0.8035 & -0.8035 & 0.8035 \\ 0.8035 & -0.8035 & 0.8035 \\ 1.6069 & -1.6069 & 1.6069 \end{bmatrix}
\end{aligned} A 100 = P D 100 P − 1 = 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 − 2 0 0 0 − 2 0 0 0 4 100 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 − 1 = 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 ( − 2 ) 100 0 0 0 ( − 2 ) 100 0 0 0 ( 4 ) 100 1 1 0 − 1 0 1 0.5 0.5 1 − 1 = 1 0 60 × 0.8035 0.8035 1.6069 − 0.8035 − 0.8035 − 1.6069 0.8035 0.8035 1.6069
Some useful properties of eigenvalues,
λ i \lambda_i λ i Trace( A ) = ∑ λ i → 1 − 5 + 4 = − 2 − 2 + 4 = 0 (\mathbf{A}) = \sum\lambda_i \qquad \rightarrow \qquad 1 - 5 + 4 = -2 - 2 + 4 = 0 ( A ) = ∑ λ i → 1 − 5 + 4 = − 2 − 2 + 4 = 0
Determinant( A ) = ∏ λ i → 1 ( − 20 + 18 ) − ( − 3 ) ( 12 − 18 ) + 3 ( − 18 + 30 ) = ( − 2 ) ( − 2 ) ( 4 ) = 16 (\mathbf{A}) = \prod\lambda_i \rightarrow 1(-20 + 18) - (-3)(12 - 18) + 3(-18 + 30) = (-2)(-2)(4) = 16 ( A ) = ∏ λ i → 1 ( − 20 + 18 ) − ( − 3 ) ( 12 − 18 ) + 3 ( − 18 + 30 ) = ( − 2 ) ( − 2 ) ( 4 ) = 16
Eigenvalue ( A ) = (\mathbf{A}) = ( A ) = eigenvalue ( A T ) = λ i → λ 1 = − 2 ; λ 2 = − 2 ; λ 3 = 4 (\mathbf{A}^T) = \lambda_i \qquad \rightarrow \qquad \lambda_1 = -2; \lambda_2 = -2; \lambda_3 = 4 ( A T ) = λ i → λ 1 = − 2 ; λ 2 = − 2 ; λ 3 = 4
Eigenvalue ( k A ) = k λ i (k\mathbf{A}) = k\lambda_i ( k A ) = k λ i ,where k ∈ R → k \in \mathbf{R} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad k ∈ R → Eigenvalue( 5 A ) = 5 λ 1 = − 10 ; 5 λ 2 = − 10 ; 5 λ 3 = 20 (\mathbf{5A}) = 5\lambda_1 = -10; 5\lambda_2 = -10; 5\lambda_3 = 20 ( 5A ) = 5 λ 1 = − 10 ; 5 λ 2 = − 10 ; 5 λ 3 = 20
Eigenvalue ( A k ) = λ i k (\mathbf{A}^k) = \lambda_i^k ( A k ) = λ i k ,where k ∈ R → k \in \mathbf{R} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad k ∈ R → Eigenvalue( A 5 ) = λ 1 5 = ( − 2 ) 5 ; λ 2 5 = ( − 2 ) 5 ; λ 3 5 = ( 4 ) 5 (\mathbf{A}^5) = \lambda_1^5 = (-2)^5; \lambda_2^5 = (-2)^5; \lambda_3^5 = (4)^5 ( A 5 ) = λ 1 5 = ( − 2 ) 5 ; λ 2 5 = ( − 2 ) 5 ; λ 3 5 = ( 4 ) 5
Eigenvalue ( A ± k I ) = λ i ± k → (\mathbf{A} \pm k\mathbf{I}) = \lambda_i \pm k \qquad \rightarrow \qquad ( A ± k I ) = λ i ± k → Eigenvalue( A + 5 I ) = λ 1 + 5 = 3 ; λ 2 + 5 = 3 ; λ 3 + 5 = 9 (\mathbf{A} + 5\mathbf{I}) = \lambda_1 + 5 = 3; \lambda_2 + 5 = 3; \lambda_3 + 5 = 9 ( A + 5 I ) = λ 1 + 5 = 3 ; λ 2 + 5 = 3 ; λ 3 + 5 = 9
(c) Cayley-Hamilton Theorem
Characteristic equation of eigenvalue/eigenvector problem is useful to compute the power of matrix.
Previously, eigenvalues/eigenvectors problem: ( A − λ I ) x = 0 \qquad (\mathbf{A} - \lambda\mathbf{I})\boldsymbol{x} = \mathbf{0} ( A − λ I ) x = 0
A = [ 1 − 3 3 3 − 5 3 6 − 6 4 ] → [ 1 − λ − 3 3 3 − 5 − λ 3 6 − 6 4 − λ ] { x 1 x 2 x 3 } = { 0 0 0 } \mathbf{A} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix} \rightarrow \begin{bmatrix} 1 - \lambda & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 - \lambda & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 - \lambda \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} A = 1 3 6 − 3 − 5 − 6 3 3 4 → 1 − λ 3 6 − 3 − 5 − λ − 6 3 3 4 − λ ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 x 2 x 3 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫ = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 ⎭ ⎬ ⎫
Characteristic eqn: f ( λ ) = ∣ ( A − λ I ) ∣ = 0 f(\lambda) = |(\mathbf{A} - \lambda\mathbf{I})| = 0 f ( λ ) = ∣ ( A − λ I ) ∣ = 0 , where λ \lambda λ = eigenvalue
p 0 + p 1 λ + p 2 λ 2 + ⋯ + p n λ n = 0 p_0 + p_1\lambda + p_2\lambda^2 + \cdots + p_n\lambda^n = 0 p 0 + p 1 λ + p 2 λ 2 + ⋯ + p n λ n = 0
λ 3 − 12 λ − 16 = 0 \lambda^3 - 12\lambda - 16 = 0 λ 3 − 12 λ − 16 = 0
Cayley-Hamilton Theorem: f ( A ) = p 0 I + p 1 A + p 2 A 2 + ⋯ + p n A n = 0 f(\mathbf{A}) = p_0\mathbf{I} + p_1\mathbf{A} + p_2\mathbf{A}^2 + \cdots + p_n\mathbf{A}^n = 0 f ( A ) = p 0 I + p 1 A + p 2 A 2 + ⋯ + p n A n = 0
,where A \mathbf{A} A is the matrix that has the eigenvalue, λ \lambda λ . It shows that not only eigenvalue can satisfy the characteristic equation, but also the original coefficient matrix, A \mathbf{A} A .
A 3 − 12 A − 16 I = 0 [ C a y l e y − H a m i l t o n F o r m ] \mathbf{A}^3 - 12\mathbf{A} - 16\mathbf{I} = \mathbf{0} \qquad [\mathit{Cayley} - \mathit{Hamilton}\ \mathit{Form}] A 3 − 12 A − 16 I = 0 [ Cayley − Hamilton Form ]
You can find A n \mathbf{A}^n A n (power of a matrix) with the characteristic equation only by using this theorem. For example:
A 2 − 12 I − 16 A − 1 = 0 → A − 1 = 1 16 ( A 2 − 12 I ) \mathbf{A}^2 - 12\mathbf{I} - 16\mathbf{A}^{-1} = \mathbf{0} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad \mathbf{A}^{-1} = \frac{1}{16}(\mathbf{A}^2 - 12\mathbf{I}) A 2 − 12 I − 16 A − 1 = 0 → A − 1 = 16 1 ( A 2 − 12 I )
A 3 = 12 A + 16 I \mathbf{A}^3 = 12\mathbf{A} + 16\mathbf{I} A 3 = 12 A + 16 I
A 4 = 12 A 2 + 16 A = 12 ( 12 I + 16 A − 1 ) + 16 A \mathbf{A}^4 = 12\mathbf{A}^2 + 16\mathbf{A} = 12(12\mathbf{I} + 16\mathbf{A}^{-1}) + 16\mathbf{A} A 4 = 12 A 2 + 16 A = 12 ( 12 I + 16 A − 1 ) + 16 A
A 5 = 12 A 3 + 16 A 2 = 12 ( 12 A + 16 I ) + 16 ( 12 I + 16 A − 1 ) \mathbf{A}^5 = 12\mathbf{A}^3 + 16\mathbf{A}^2 = 12(12\mathbf{A} + 16\mathbf{I}) + 16(12\mathbf{I} + 16\mathbf{A}^{-1}) A 5 = 12 A 3 + 16 A 2 = 12 ( 12 A + 16 I ) + 16 ( 12 I + 16 A − 1 )
⋮ \vdots ⋮
7.4 Engineering Application of Solving Homogeneous System of Linear Equations
So far, we have determined the eigenvalue & eigenvector for a homogeneous system of linear equations. This information is useful to find the eigenfunction (i.e. Each of a set of independent functions which are the solutions to a given differential equation.)
Given stiffness , k = k 1 = k 2 = 200 N/m k = k_1 = k_2 = 200\text{ N/m} k = k 1 = k 2 = 200 N/m ;
mass , m = m 1 = m 2 = 40 kg m = m_1 = m_2 = 40\text{ kg} m = m 1 = m 2 = 40 kg
The equations of motion of the 2 mass spring systems are provided:
− k x 1 − k ( x 1 − x 2 ) = m 1 x ¨ 1 -kx_1 - k(x_1 - x_2) = m_1\ddot{x}_1 − k x 1 − k ( x 1 − x 2 ) = m 1 x ¨ 1
k ( x 1 − x 2 ) − k x 2 = m 2 x ¨ 2 k(x_1 - x_2) - kx_2 = m_2\ddot{x}_2 k ( x 1 − x 2 ) − k x 2 = m 2 x ¨ 2
where x 1 = A 1 sin ( ω t + θ 1 ) , x ¨ 1 = − ω 2 x 1 \text{where } x_1 = A_1\sin(\omega t + \theta_1) \ , \quad \ddot{x}_1 = -\omega^2x_1 where x 1 = A 1 sin ( ω t + θ 1 ) , x ¨ 1 = − ω 2 x 1
x 2 = A 2 sin ( ω t + θ 2 ) , x ¨ 2 = − ω 2 x 2 x_2 = A_2\sin(\omega t + \theta_2) \ , \quad \ddot{x}_2 = -\omega^2x_2 x 2 = A 2 sin ( ω t + θ 2 ) , x ¨ 2 = − ω 2 x 2
[ 10 − ω 2 − 5 − 5 10 − ω 2 ] { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 } \begin{bmatrix} 10 - \omega^2 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \omega^2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} [ 10 − ω 2 − 5 − 5 10 − ω 2 ] { x 1 x 2 } = { 0 0 }
Previously, solving the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem gives:
Eigenvalue: λ 1 = 5 ; λ 2 = 15 \lambda_1 = 5; \lambda_2 = 15 λ 1 = 5 ; λ 2 = 15
(where ω 1 = λ 1 ; ω 2 = λ 2 \omega_1 = \sqrt{\lambda_1}; \omega_2 = \sqrt{\lambda_2} ω 1 = λ 1 ; ω 2 = λ 2 )
Eigenvector: { x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 1 1 } ; { x 1 x 2 } 2 = { 1 − 1 } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} ; \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix} { x 1 x 2 } 1 = { 1 1 } ; { x 1 x 2 } 2 = { 1 − 1 }
Note: Finding eigenfunction or the solution of homogeneous system of linear equations is out of scope and it is including here for your extra info.
Eigenfunction #1 = { x 1 x 2 } 1 sin ( λ 1 t + θ 1 ) = { 1 1 } sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) \text{Eigenfunction \#1} = \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 \sin(\sqrt{\lambda_1}t + \theta_1) = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1) Eigenfunction #1 = { x 1 x 2 } 1 sin ( λ 1 t + θ 1 ) = { 1 1 } sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )
Eigenfunction #2 = { x 1 x 2 } 2 sin ( λ 2 t + θ 2 ) = { 1 − 1 } sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) \text{Eigenfunction \#2} = \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 \sin(\sqrt{\lambda_2}t + \theta_2) = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2) Eigenfunction #2 = { x 1 x 2 } 2 sin ( λ 2 t + θ 2 ) = { 1 − 1 } sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )
The total solution of the homogeneous linear algebraic system is equal to the superposition of all the eigenfunctions:
{ x 1 x 2 } = c 1 { 1 1 } sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) + c 2 { 1 − 1 } sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = c_1\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1) + c_2\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2) { x 1 x 2 } = c 1 { 1 1 } sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) + c 2 { 1 − 1 } sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )
,where c 1 c_1 c 1 & c 2 c_2 c 2 are unknown constants that can be obtained from the initial or boundary conditions. You will learn it in the ODE chapter later.
Verification of eigenfunction as the solution to the equations:
− 200 x 1 − 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) = 40 x ¨ 1 -200x_1 - 200(x_1 - x_2) = 40\ddot{x}_1 − 200 x 1 − 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) = 40 x ¨ 1
200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) − 200 x 2 = 40 x ¨ 2 200(x_1 - x_2) - 200x_2 = 40\ddot{x}_2 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) − 200 x 2 = 40 x ¨ 2
Verification of eigenfunction #1: { x 1 x 2 } = { 1 1 } sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1) { x 1 x 2 } = { 1 1 } sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ; { x ¨ 1 x ¨ 2 } = { − 5 − 5 } sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) \begin{Bmatrix} \ddot{x}_1 \\ \ddot{x}_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} -5 \\ -5 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1) { x ¨ 1 x ¨ 2 } = { − 5 − 5 } sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )
LHS RHS − 200 x 1 − 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) -200x_1 - 200(x_1 - x_2) − 200 x 1 − 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) = − 200 ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) − 200 ( ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) − ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) ) = -200(\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) - 200\left((\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) - (\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))\right) = − 200 ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) − 200 ( ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) − ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) ) = − 200 ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) = -200(\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) = − 200 ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) 40 x ¨ 1 40\ddot{x}_1 40 x ¨ 1 = 40 ( − 5 sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) = 40(-5\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) = 40 ( − 5 sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) = ( − 200 sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) = (-200\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) = ( − 200 sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) − 200 x 2 200(x_1 - x_2) - 200x_2 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) − 200 x 2 = 200 ( ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) − ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) ) − 200 ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) = 200\left((\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) - (\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))\right) - 200(\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) = 200 ( ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) − ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) ) − 200 ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) = − 200 ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) = -200(\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) = − 200 ( sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) 40 x ¨ 2 40\ddot{x}_2 40 x ¨ 2 = 40 ( − 5 sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) = 40(-5\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) = 40 ( − 5 sin ( 5 t + θ 1 )) = ( − 200 sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ) ) = (-200\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) = ( − 200 sin ( 5 t + θ 1 ))
∴ \therefore ∴ Since L H S = R H S LHS = RHS L H S = R H S , thus it is proven that eigenfunction #1 is one of the solution
Verification of eigenfunction #2: { 1 − 1 } sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2) { 1 − 1 } sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ; { − 15 15 } sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) \begin{Bmatrix} -15 \\ 15 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2) { − 15 15 } sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )
LHS RHS − 200 x 1 − 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) -200x_1 - 200(x_1 - x_2) − 200 x 1 − 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) = − 200 ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) − 200 ( ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) − ( − sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) ) = -200(\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) - 200\left((\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) - (-\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))\right) = − 200 ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) − 200 ( ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) − ( − sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) ) = − 600 ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) = -600(\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) = − 600 ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) 40 x ¨ 1 40\ddot{x}_1 40 x ¨ 1 = 40 ( − 15 sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) = 40(-15\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) = 40 ( − 15 sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) = ( − 600 sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) = (-600\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) = ( − 600 sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) − 200 x 2 200(x_1 - x_2) - 200x_2 200 ( x 1 − x 2 ) − 200 x 2 = 200 ( ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) − ( − sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) ) − 200 ( − sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) = 200\left((\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) - (-\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))\right) - 200(-\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) = 200 ( ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) − ( − sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) ) − 200 ( − sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) = 600 ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) = 600(\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) = 600 ( sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) 40 x ¨ 2 40\ddot{x}_2 40 x ¨ 2 = 40 ( 15 sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) = 40(15\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) = 40 ( 15 sin ( 15 t + θ 2 )) = ( 600 sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ) ) = (600\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) = ( 600 sin ( 15 t + θ 2 ))
∴ \therefore ∴ Since L H S = R H S LHS = RHS L H S = R H S , thus it is proven that eigenfunction #2 is one of the solution