Skip to main content

Lecture 7: Matrix Algebra for Homogeneous Linear Algebraic Systems

Download the original PDF →


7.1 Solving Homogeneous System of Linear Equations​

Multicomponent systems result in nn set(s) of mathematical equations that must be solved simultaneously. It can be represented by the following matrix format: [C]{X}={B}[C]\{X\} = \{B\}. If {B}={0}\{B\} = \{0\}, it is known as homogeneous system of linear equations.

(i) In this study, methods used to solve the total solution of {X}\{X\} by using the [C][C] & zero {B}\{B\} is out of scope.

Linear Algebraic EquationsCoefficient Matrix, [C][C]Unknown, {X}\{X\}Zero {B}\{B\}
0.5x1+2.5x2−9x3=00.5x_1 + 2.5x_2 - 9x_3 = 0
−4.5x1+3.5x2−2x3=0-4.5x_1 + 3.5x_2 - 2x_3 = 0
−8x1−9x2+22x3=0-8x_1 - 9x_2 + 22x_3 = 0

n=3n=3 where 3 sets of eqns. are given to solve x1x_1 , x2x_2 and x3x_3 respectively.
[0.52.5−9−4.53.5−2−8−922]\begin{bmatrix} 0.5 & 2.5 & -9 \\ -4.5 & 3.5 & -2 \\ -8 & -9 & 22 \end{bmatrix}{x1x2x3}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}{000}\begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

Depending on the coefficient matrix that represents any physical system or application.

  • If ∣C∣=0|C| = 0 & {B}={0}\{B\} = \{0\}, then the solutions of {X}\{X\} due to initial/boundary conditions are non-zero/ non-trivial.
  • If ∣C∣≠0|C| \neq 0 & {B}={0}\{B\} = \{0\}, then the solutions of {X}\{X\} due to initial/boundary conditions are zero/ trivial.

(ii) In this study, the main focus is to find the characteristic of the system in terms of the eigenvalue, λi\lambda_i & the corresponding eigenvector, {x1x2x3}λi\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda_i} where i=1,2,…,n modei = 1,2, \dots, n\ \textit{mode}. This is known as eigenvalue/eigenvector problem.

[A]{x}i=[λi]{x}i[A]\{x\}_i = [\lambda_i]\{x\}_i

([A]−λi[I]){x}i={0}([A] - \lambda_i[I])\{x\}_i = \{0\}

where λi\lambda_i is one of the eigenvalue of the matrix [A] ;

{x}i\{x\}_i is the corresponding eigenvector for each λi\lambda_i and {x}i≠{0}\{x\}_i \neq \{0\}, i.e. non-trivial solutions;

[I][I] = identity matrix

Note: In general, nn dof system has nn number of eigenvalue & eigenvector. For example: 2 dof mass-spring system has 2 eigenvalues and 2 eigenvectors, while 3 dof electrical circuit system has 3 eigenvalues and 3 eigenvectors.

7.2 Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem​

Example: Link the eigenvalue and eigenvector to the characteristic of the given system.

Solution

2 mass spring system

Given stiffness, k=k1=k2=200 N/mk = k_1 = k_2 = 200\text{ N/m} ;

mass, m=m1=m2=40 kgm = m_1 = m_2 = 40\text{ kg}

The equations of motion of the 2 mass spring systems are provided:

−kx1−k(x1−x2)=m1x¨1-kx_1 - k(x_1 - x_2) = m_1\ddot{x}_1 k(x1−x2)−kx2=m2x¨2k(x_1 - x_2) - kx_2 = m_2\ddot{x}_2 where x1=A1sin⁡(ωt+θ1) ,x¨1=−ω2x1\text{where } x_1 = A_1\sin(\omega t + \theta_1) \ , \quad \ddot{x}_1 = -\omega^2x_1 x2=A2sin⁡(ωt+θ2) ,x¨2=−ω2x2x_2 = A_2\sin(\omega t + \theta_2) \ , \quad \ddot{x}_2 = -\omega^2x_2

[2km1−ω2−km1−km22km2−ω2]{x1x2}={00}\begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{2k}{m_1} - \omega^2 & -\dfrac{k}{m_1} \\ -\dfrac{k}{m_2} & \dfrac{2k}{m_2} - \omega^2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

Note: The derivation of the eqns involves theory of vibration, thus it is not examined in this study.

[10−ω2−5−510−ω2]{x1x2}={00}\begin{bmatrix} 10 - \omega^2 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \omega^2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

([10−5−510]−ω2[1001]){x1x2}={00}\left(\begin{bmatrix} 10 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 \end{bmatrix} - \omega^2\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\right)\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

[10−5−510]{x1x2}−ω2{x1x2}={00}\begin{bmatrix} 10 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} - \omega^2\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

[10−5−510]{x1x2}=ω2{x1x2}\begin{bmatrix} 10 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \omega^2\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}

([A]−λi[I]){x}i={0}([A] - \lambda_i[I])\{x\}_i = \{0\}

[A11−λmode iA12A21A22−λmode i]{x1x2}mode i={00}\begin{bmatrix} A_{11} - \lambda_{mode\ i} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} - \lambda_{mode\ i} \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

([A11A12A21A22]−λmode i[1001]){x1x2}mode i={00}\left(\begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{bmatrix} - \lambda_{mode\ i}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\right)\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

[A11A12A21A22]{x1x2}mode i−λmode i{x1x2}mode i={00}\begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} - \lambda_{mode\ i}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

[A11A12A21A22]{x1x2}mode i=λmode i{x1x2}mode i\begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i} = \lambda_{mode\ i}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_{mode\ i}

By comparing the general formulation of the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem,

[A]{x}i=[λi]{x}i[A]\{x\}_i = [\lambda_i]\{x\}_i

We find that the coefficient matrix, [A]=[10−5−510][A] = \begin{bmatrix} 10 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 \end{bmatrix}

Eigenvalue, [λi]=ω2[\lambda_i] = \omega^2 where ω\omega = natural frequency of the system

Eigenvector, {x}i={x1x2}\{x\}_i = \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = mode shape of the system (i.e. pattern of the maximum vibration amplitude) at the corresponding iith mode/ case

Note: Natural frequency and mode shape are important characteristics for a vibration system that can be obtained from the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem.

Example: Solving the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem.

Solution

[10−ω2−5−510−ω2]{x1x2}={00}\begin{bmatrix} 10 - \omega^2 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \omega^2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

To have non-trivial solution, {x1x2}≠{00}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} \neq \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}. The determinant must be zero.

∣10−ω2−5−510−ω2∣=0\begin{vmatrix} 10 - \omega^2 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \omega^2 \end{vmatrix} = 0

Let the eigenvalue, λ=ω2\lambda = \omega^2

∣10−λ−5−510−λ∣=0\begin{vmatrix} 10 - \lambda & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \lambda \end{vmatrix} = 0

λ2−20λ+75=0Note: This is known as characteristic equation.\lambda^2 - 20\lambda + 75 = 0 \qquad \text{Note: This is known as } \textbf{characteristic equation}.

We obtain 2 eigenvalues for the 2 mass spring system: λ1=5\lambda_1 = 5 and λ2=15\lambda_2 = 15

Hint: Common practice is to arrange λi\lambda_i in ascending order, i.e. λ1<λ2\lambda_1 < \lambda_2

Since λ=ω2\lambda = \omega^2, we can obtain the natural frequencies for the system: ω1=5\omega_1 = \sqrt{5} and ω2=15\omega_2 = \sqrt{15}

At mode 1, ω1=5\omega_1 = \sqrt{5} or λ1=5\lambda_1 = 5, we obtain the unscaled eigenvector as following:

[5−5−55]{x1x2}1={00}→expand5x1−5x2=0−5x1+5x2=0→x1=1, x2=1 for both eqns{x1x2}1={11}\begin{bmatrix} 5 & -5 \\ -5 & 5 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} \quad \xrightarrow{\text{expand}} \quad \begin{gathered} 5x_1 - 5x_2 = 0 \\ -5x_1 + 5x_2 = 0 \end{gathered} \quad \xrightarrow{x_1 = 1,\ x_2 = 1 \text{ for both eqns}} \quad \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}

Unscaled eigenvector for mode #1 at ω1 = √5

Unscaled eigenvector for mode #1 at ω1=5\omega_1 = \sqrt{5}

{x1x2}1={11}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} means that the maximum vibration of x1x_1 will be in phase with x2x_2, where both masses move to +x direction by one unit to the right at same time.

Unscaled eigenvector for mode #1 at ω1 = √5, scaled by 5

Unscaled eigenvector for mode #1 at ω1=5\omega_1 = \sqrt{5}

{x1x2}1={55}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 5 \\ 5 \end{Bmatrix} is also an acceptable unscaled eigenvector answer. The most important point is eigenvector tells the unique shape/ vibration pattern at each mode regardless of the scale. In general, all acceptable solutions of eigenvector are called eigenspace, i.e. {x1x2}1=t{11}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = t\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} , where −∞≤t≤∞-\infty \leq t \leq \infty.

Normalized eigenvector has unique shape and unique scale by using the following formula:

{x1,scalex2,scale}1=1magnitude{x1,unscalex2,unscale}1=±112+12{11}=±152+52{55}=±{0.7070.707}\begin{Bmatrix} x_{1,scale} \\ x_{2,scale} \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \frac{1}{\text{magnitude}\begin{Bmatrix} x_{1,unscale} \\ x_{2,unscale} \end{Bmatrix}_1} = \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{1^2 + 1^2}}\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} = \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{5^2 + 5^2}}\begin{Bmatrix} 5 \\ 5 \end{Bmatrix} = \pm\begin{Bmatrix} 0.707 \\ 0.707 \end{Bmatrix}

At mode 2, ω2=15\omega_2 = \sqrt{15} or λ2=15\lambda_2 = 15, we obtain the unscaled eigenvector as following:

[−5−5−5−5]{x1x2}2={00}→expand−5x1−5x2=0−5x1−5x2=0→x1=1, x2=−1 for both eqns{x1x2}2={1−1}\begin{bmatrix} -5 & -5 \\ -5 & -5 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} \quad \xrightarrow{\text{expand}} \quad \begin{gathered} -5x_1 - 5x_2 = 0 \\ -5x_1 - 5x_2 = 0 \end{gathered} \quad \xrightarrow{x_1 = 1,\ x_2 = -1 \text{ for both eqns}} \quad \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix}

Unscaled eigenvector for mode #2 at ω2 = √15

Unscaled eigenvector for mode #2 at ω2=15\omega_2 = \sqrt{15}

{x1x2}2={1−1}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix} means that at ω2=15 rad s−1\omega_2 = \sqrt{15}\ rad\,s^{-1}, the maximum vibration of x1x_1 will be out of phase with x2x_2, where one mass moves to +x direction while other to -x direction at same time.

Eigenspace for mode #2

{x1x2}2=t{1−1} , where −∞≤t≤∞.\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = t\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix} \ , \text{ where } -\infty \leq t \leq \infty.

Normalized eigenvector for mode #2

{x1,scalex2,scale}2=1magnitude{x1,unscalex2,unscale}2=±112+12{1−1}=±{0.707−0.707}\begin{Bmatrix} x_{1,scale} \\ x_{2,scale} \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \frac{1}{\text{magnitude}\begin{Bmatrix} x_{1,unscale} \\ x_{2,unscale} \end{Bmatrix}_2} = \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{1^2 + 1^2}}\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix} = \pm\begin{Bmatrix} 0.707 \\ -0.707 \end{Bmatrix}

Note: Depending on questions, student should know how to find unscaled eigenvector/ eigenspace/ normalized eigenvector. In general, if it is not stated for manual calculation, then providing unscaled eigenvector (t=1t = 1) is sufficient. For software calculation, normalised eigenvector is used usually.

Visualisation of the eigenvalue & eigenvector information:

Mode 1/ Case 1Mode 2/ Case 2
Eigenvalue, λ1=5\lambda_1 = 5
Natural frequency, ω1=5\omega_1 = \sqrt{5} (Lower frequency)
Unscaled eigenvector (also called mode shape),
{x1x2}1=±{11}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \pm\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}
λ2=15\lambda_2 = 15
ω2=15\omega_2 = \sqrt{15} (Higher frequency)

{x1x2}2=±{1−1}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \pm\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix}
Mode 1/ Case 1: at t=0 the eigenvector is (1,1), at t=1.405 s it is (-1,-1), at t=2.810 s it is (1,1)Mode 2/ Case 2: at t=0 the eigenvector is (-1,1), at t=0.811 s it is (1,-1), at t=1.622 s it is (-1,1); higher frequency, faster oscillation

Hint: Period = 1/ Frequency = 2π/ω2\pi/\omega

Example: Find the eigenvalues & eigenvectors of the following matrix.

Solution

A=[1−333−536−64]\mathbf{A} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}

Eigenvalues/eigenvectors problem: (A−λI)x=0\qquad (\mathbf{A} - \lambda\mathbf{I})\boldsymbol{x} = \mathbf{0}

([1−333−536−64]−λ[100010001]){x1x2x3}={000}\left(\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix} - \lambda\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\right)\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

[1−λ−333−5−λ36−64−λ]{x1x2x3}={000}\begin{bmatrix} 1 - \lambda & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 - \lambda & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 - \lambda \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

Since {x1x2x3}≠{000}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} \neq \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} , ∣1−λ−333−5−λ36−64−λ∣=0\qquad \begin{vmatrix} 1 - \lambda & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 - \lambda & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 - \lambda \end{vmatrix} = 0

(1−λ)[(−5−λ)(4−λ)−3(−6)]−(−3)[3(4−λ)−3(6)]+3[3(−6)−(−5−λ)(6)]=0(1 - \lambda)\left[(-5 - \lambda)(4 - \lambda) - 3(-6)\right] - (-3)\left[3(4 - \lambda) - 3(6)\right] + 3\left[3(-6) - (-5 - \lambda)(6)\right] = 0

Characteristic eqn: λ3−12λ−16=0\qquad \lambda^3 - 12\lambda - 16 = 0

(λ−4)(λ2+4λ+4)=0(\lambda - 4)(\lambda^2 + 4\lambda + 4) = 0

λ1=−2 ,λ2=−2 (Repeated eigenvalue case),λ3=4\lambda_1 = -2 \ , \lambda_2 = -2 \text{ (Repeated eigenvalue case)}, \lambda_3 = 4

Case 1: λ1=−2\lambda_1 = -2 , Case 2: λ2=−2\lambda_2 = -2 (Repeated eigenvalue case)

[3−333−336−66]{x1x2x3}λ=−2={000}\begin{bmatrix} 3 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -3 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 6 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = -2} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

→augmented[1−1103−3306−660]\xrightarrow{\text{augmented}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 3 & -3 & 3 & 0 \\ 6 & -6 & 6 & 0 \end{array}\right]

→R1→R13scale pivot element to 1[1−1103−3306−660]\xrightarrow[R_1 \to \frac{R_1}{3}]{\text{scale pivot element to 1}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 3 & -3 & 3 & 0 \\ 6 & -6 & 6 & 0 \end{array}\right]

→R2→R2−3R1, R3→R3−6R1Forward elimination[1−11000000000]Note: RREF shows rank 1 (i.e. 1 linearly independent vector)\xrightarrow[R_2 \to R_2 - 3R_1,\ R_3 \to R_3 - 6R_1]{\text{Forward elimination}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \qquad \text{Note: RREF shows rank 1 (i.e. 1 linearly independent vector)}

x1−x2+x3=0x_1 - x_2 + x_3 = 0

x1=x2−x3x_1 = x_2 - x_3

Eigenspace for {x1x2x3}λ=−2={x2−x3x2x3}={x2x20}+{−x30x3}=t{110}∣x2=t+s{−101}∣x3=s ,where t & s∈R\textit{Eigenspace for } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = -2} = \begin{Bmatrix} x_2 - x_3 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} x_2 \\ x_2 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} + \begin{Bmatrix} -x_3 \\ 0 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = t\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}\Bigg|_{x_2 = t} + s\begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\Bigg|_{x_3 = s} \ , \text{where } t \ \& \ s \in \mathbf{R}

Eigenvectors, {x1x2x3}λ=−2={110} & {−101} for repeated eigenvalues λ1=−2 ,λ2=−2 respectively.\textit{Eigenvectors, } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = -2} = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} \ \& \ \begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} \text{ for repeated eigenvalues } \lambda_1 = -2 \ , \lambda_2 = -2 \text{ respectively.}

Case 3: λ3=4\lambda_3 = 4 (Distinct eigenvalue case)

[−3−333−936−60]{x1x2x3}λ=4={000}\begin{bmatrix} -3 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -9 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 0 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = 4} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

→augmented[−3−3303−9306−600]\xrightarrow{\text{augmented}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} -3 & -3 & 3 & 0 \\ 3 & -9 & 3 & 0 \\ 6 & -6 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right]

→R1→−R13scale pivot element to 1[11−103−9306−600]\xrightarrow[R_1 \to -\frac{R_1}{3}]{\text{scale pivot element to 1}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 3 & -9 & 3 & 0 \\ 6 & -6 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right]

→R2→R2−3R1, R3→R3−6R1Forward elimination[11−100−12600−1260]\xrightarrow[R_2 \to R_2 - 3R_1,\ R_3 \to R_3 - 6R_1]{\text{Forward elimination}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & -12 & 6 & 0 \\ 0 & -12 & 6 & 0 \end{array}\right]

→R2→−R212scale pivot element to 1[11−1001−1200−1260]\xrightarrow[R_2 \to -\frac{R_2}{12}]{\text{scale pivot element to 1}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 0 & -12 & 6 & 0 \end{array}\right]

→R3→R3+12R2Forward elimination[11−1001−1200000]\xrightarrow[R_3 \to R_3 + 12R_2]{\text{Forward elimination}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right]

→R1→R1−R2Forward elimination[10−12001−1200000]Note: RREF shows rank 2 (i.e. 2 linearly independent vectors)\xrightarrow[R_1 \to R_1 - R_2]{\text{Forward elimination}} \left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right] \qquad \text{Note: RREF shows rank 2 (i.e. 2 linearly independent vectors)}

x1−12x3=0>>x1=12x3x_1 - \frac{1}{2}x_3 = 0 \quad >> \quad x_1 = \frac{1}{2}x_3

x2−12x3=0>>x2=12x3x_2 - \frac{1}{2}x_3 = 0 \quad >> \quad x_2 = \frac{1}{2}x_3

Eigenspace for {x1x2x3}λ=4={12x312x3x3}=t{12121}∣x3=t ,where t∈R\textit{Eigenspace for } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = 4} = \begin{Bmatrix} \frac{1}{2}x_3 \\ \frac{1}{2}x_3 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = t\begin{Bmatrix} \frac{1}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\Bigg|_{x_3 = t} \ , \text{where } t \in \mathbf{R}

Eigenvector, {x1x2x3}λ=4={0.50.51}\textit{Eigenvector, } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = 4} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0.5 \\ 0.5 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}

For verification of the eigenvector results, it should satisfy the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem:

[A]{x}i=[λi]{x}i[A]\{x\}_i = [\lambda_i]\{x\}_i

Case 1 (λ=−2\lambda = -2)Case 2 (λ=−2\lambda = -2)Case 3 (λ=4\lambda = 4)
[1−333−536−64]{110}=−2{110}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} = -2\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}[1−333−536−64]{−101}=−2{−101}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} = -2\begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}[1−333−536−64]{0.50.51}=4{0.50.51}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} 0.5 \\ 0.5 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} = 4\begin{Bmatrix} 0.5 \\ 0.5 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}

Or we can combine all cases into single matrix operation:

Eigenvector/ Modal matrix consists of all eigenvectors, P\mathbf{P}Eigenvalue/ Spectral matrix consists of all eigenvalues, D\mathbf{D}Verification of Eigenvalue/ Eigenvector Problem for All Cases
P\mathbf{P} or [P][P]

=[{x1x2x3}1{x1x2x3}2{x1x2x3}3]= \left[\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_1 \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_2 \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_3\right]

=[1−10.5100.5011]= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}

where

{x1x2x3}1=eigenvector #1\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \textit{eigenvector \#1}
D\mathbf{D} or [D][D]

=[λ1000λ2000λ3]= \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_3 \end{bmatrix}

=[−2000−20004]= \begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix}

where

λ1=eigenvalue #1\lambda_1 = \textit{eigenvalue \#1}
[A]{x}i=[λi]{x}i→extend[A]\{x\}_i = [\lambda_i]\{x\}_i \xrightarrow{\text{extend}}

[A][P]=[P][D][A][P] = [P][D]

[1−333−536−64][1−10.5100.5011]=[1−10.5100.5011][−2000−20004]\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix}

=−2[100100000]−2[0−10000010]+4[000.5000.5001]= -2\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} -2\begin{bmatrix} 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} + 4\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}

∴\therefore Since LHS = RHS, [P][P] and [D][D] are verified.

7.3 Engineering Application of Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem​

(a) Diagonalization​

  • Eigenvectors are useful to diagonalize a square matrix:
  • D=P−1AP\mathbf{D} = \mathbf{P}^{-1}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{P} if ∣P∣≠0|\mathbf{P}| \neq 0 where P=\mathbf{P} = full rank eigenvector or modal matrix

Previously, eigenvalues/eigenvectors problem: (A−λI)x=0\qquad (\mathbf{A} - \lambda\mathbf{I})\boldsymbol{x} = \mathbf{0}

A=[1−333−536−64]→[1−λ−333−5−λ36−64−λ]{x1x2x3}={000}\mathbf{A} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix} \rightarrow \begin{bmatrix} 1 - \lambda & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 - \lambda & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 - \lambda \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

Eigenvectors, {x1x2x3}λ=−2={110} & {−101}\textit{Eigenvectors, } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = -2} = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix} \ \& \ \begin{Bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}

Eigenvector, {x1x2x3}λ=4={0.50.51}\textit{Eigenvector, } \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda = 4} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0.5 \\ 0.5 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}

∴Eigenvector matrix consists of all eigenvectors, P=[{x1x2x3}λ1{x1x2x3}λ2{x1x2x3}λ3]=[1−10.5100.5011]\therefore \textit{Eigenvector matrix consists of all eigenvectors, } \mathbf{P} = \left[\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda_1} \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda_2} \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix}_{\lambda_3}\right] = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}

D=P−1AP=[1−10.5100.5011]−1[1−333−536−64][1−10.5100.5011]=[−2000−20004]\mathbf{D} = \mathbf{P}^{-1}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{P} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}^{-1}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix}

Note: We can convert a non-diagonal matrix A\mathbf{A} to a diagonal matrix, where the diagonal matrix, D\mathbf{D} consists of the eigenvalues of matrix A\mathbf{A} at the diagonal elements. λ1=−2 ,λ2=−2,λ3=4\lambda_1 = -2 \ , \lambda_2 = -2, \lambda_3 = 4

(b) Extension from Diagonalization​

D=P−1AP\mathbf{D} = \mathbf{P}^{-1}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{P}

A=PDP−1\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}\mathbf{P}^{-1}

,where A\mathbf{A} can be expressed in terms of the eigenvector matrix, P\mathbf{P} and eigenvalue matrix, D\mathbf{D}

A2=AA=(PDP−1)(PDP−1)=(PD2P−1)where P−1P=I\mathbf{A}^2 = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{A} = (\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}\mathbf{P}^{-1})(\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}\mathbf{P}^{-1}) = (\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^2\mathbf{P}^{-1}) \qquad \text{where } \mathbf{P}^{-1}\mathbf{P} = \mathbf{I}

A3=A2A=(PD2P−1)(PDP−1)=(PD3P−1)\mathbf{A}^3 = \mathbf{A}^2\mathbf{A} = (\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^2\mathbf{P}^{-1})(\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}\mathbf{P}^{-1}) = (\mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^3\mathbf{P}^{-1})

⋮\vdots

Ak=PDkP−1where Dk=[λ1000λ2000λ3]k=[λ1k000λ2k000λ3k] ,where k∈R\mathbf{A}^k = \mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^k\mathbf{P}^{-1} \qquad \text{where } \mathbf{D}^k = \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_3 \end{bmatrix}^k = \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_1^k & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2^k & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_3^k \end{bmatrix} \ , \text{where } k \in \mathbf{R}

(Comment: power of a diagonal matrix can be computed easily!)

Note: This formula implies that change of power of A\mathbf{A} will change the eigenvalue matrix while remain the eigenvector matrix, If A\mathbf{A} has eigenvalues of λ1,λ2,λ3\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3. Then, Ak\mathbf{A}^k has eigenvalues of λ1k,λ2k,λ3k\lambda_1^k, \lambda_2^k, \lambda_3^k. e.g. A−1\mathbf{A}^{-1} has eigenvalues of 1λ1,1λ2,1λ3\dfrac{1}{\lambda_1}, \dfrac{1}{\lambda_2}, \dfrac{1}{\lambda_3}.

You can find Ak\mathbf{A}^k (power of a matrix) with the eigenvalue & eigenvector matrix by using this formula.

A=[1−333−536−64] ;Eigenvalue matrix, D=[−2000−20004];Eigenvector matrix, P=[1−10.5100.5011]\mathbf{A} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix} \ ; \quad \text{Eigenvalue matrix, } \mathbf{D} = \begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix} ; \quad \text{Eigenvector matrix, } \mathbf{P} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}

A100=PD100P−1=[1−10.5100.5011][−2000−20004]100[1−10.5100.5011]−1=[1−10.5100.5011][(−2)100000(−2)100000(4)100][1−10.5100.5011]−1=1060×[0.8035−0.80350.80350.8035−0.80350.80351.6069−1.60691.6069]\begin{aligned} \mathbf{A}^{100} = \mathbf{P}\mathbf{D}^{100}\mathbf{P}^{-1} &= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix}^{100}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}^{-1} \\ &= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} (-2)^{100} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & (-2)^{100} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & (4)^{100} \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -1 & 0.5 \\ 1 & 0 & 0.5 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}^{-1} \\ &= 10^{60} \times \begin{bmatrix} 0.8035 & -0.8035 & 0.8035 \\ 0.8035 & -0.8035 & 0.8035 \\ 1.6069 & -1.6069 & 1.6069 \end{bmatrix} \end{aligned}
Some useful properties of eigenvalues, λi\lambda_i

Trace(A)=∑λi→1−5+4=−2−2+4=0(\mathbf{A}) = \sum\lambda_i \qquad \rightarrow \qquad 1 - 5 + 4 = -2 - 2 + 4 = 0

Determinant(A)=∏λi→1(−20+18)−(−3)(12−18)+3(−18+30)=(−2)(−2)(4)=16(\mathbf{A}) = \prod\lambda_i \rightarrow 1(-20 + 18) - (-3)(12 - 18) + 3(-18 + 30) = (-2)(-2)(4) = 16

Eigenvalue (A)=(\mathbf{A}) = eigenvalue (AT)=λi→λ1=−2;λ2=−2;λ3=4(\mathbf{A}^T) = \lambda_i \qquad \rightarrow \qquad \lambda_1 = -2; \lambda_2 = -2; \lambda_3 = 4

Eigenvalue (kA)=kλi(k\mathbf{A}) = k\lambda_i ,where k∈R→k \in \mathbf{R} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad Eigenvalue(5A)=5λ1=−10;5λ2=−10;5λ3=20(\mathbf{5A}) = 5\lambda_1 = -10; 5\lambda_2 = -10; 5\lambda_3 = 20

Eigenvalue (Ak)=λik(\mathbf{A}^k) = \lambda_i^k ,where k∈R→k \in \mathbf{R} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad Eigenvalue(A5)=λ15=(−2)5;λ25=(−2)5;λ35=(4)5(\mathbf{A}^5) = \lambda_1^5 = (-2)^5; \lambda_2^5 = (-2)^5; \lambda_3^5 = (4)^5

Eigenvalue (A±kI)=λi±k→(\mathbf{A} \pm k\mathbf{I}) = \lambda_i \pm k \qquad \rightarrow \qquad Eigenvalue(A+5I)=λ1+5=3;λ2+5=3;λ3+5=9(\mathbf{A} + 5\mathbf{I}) = \lambda_1 + 5 = 3; \lambda_2 + 5 = 3; \lambda_3 + 5 = 9

(c) Cayley-Hamilton Theorem​

  • Characteristic equation of eigenvalue/eigenvector problem is useful to compute the power of matrix.

Previously, eigenvalues/eigenvectors problem: (A−λI)x=0\qquad (\mathbf{A} - \lambda\mathbf{I})\boldsymbol{x} = \mathbf{0}

A=[1−333−536−64]→[1−λ−333−5−λ36−64−λ]{x1x2x3}={000}\mathbf{A} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 \end{bmatrix} \rightarrow \begin{bmatrix} 1 - \lambda & -3 & 3 \\ 3 & -5 - \lambda & 3 \\ 6 & -6 & 4 - \lambda \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

  • Characteristic eqn: f(λ)=∣(A−λI)∣=0f(\lambda) = |(\mathbf{A} - \lambda\mathbf{I})| = 0, where λ\lambda = eigenvalue

    p0+p1λ+p2λ2+⋯+pnλn=0p_0 + p_1\lambda + p_2\lambda^2 + \cdots + p_n\lambda^n = 0

    λ3−12λ−16=0\lambda^3 - 12\lambda - 16 = 0

  • Cayley-Hamilton Theorem: f(A)=p0I+p1A+p2A2+⋯+pnAn=0f(\mathbf{A}) = p_0\mathbf{I} + p_1\mathbf{A} + p_2\mathbf{A}^2 + \cdots + p_n\mathbf{A}^n = 0

,where A\mathbf{A} is the matrix that has the eigenvalue, λ\lambda. It shows that not only eigenvalue can satisfy the characteristic equation, but also the original coefficient matrix, A\mathbf{A}.

A3−12A−16I=0[Cayley−Hamilton Form]\mathbf{A}^3 - 12\mathbf{A} - 16\mathbf{I} = \mathbf{0} \qquad [\mathit{Cayley} - \mathit{Hamilton}\ \mathit{Form}]

You can find An\mathbf{A}^n (power of a matrix) with the characteristic equation only by using this theorem. For example:

A2−12I−16A−1=0→A−1=116(A2−12I)\mathbf{A}^2 - 12\mathbf{I} - 16\mathbf{A}^{-1} = \mathbf{0} \qquad \rightarrow \qquad \mathbf{A}^{-1} = \frac{1}{16}(\mathbf{A}^2 - 12\mathbf{I})

A3=12A+16I\mathbf{A}^3 = 12\mathbf{A} + 16\mathbf{I}

A4=12A2+16A=12(12I+16A−1)+16A\mathbf{A}^4 = 12\mathbf{A}^2 + 16\mathbf{A} = 12(12\mathbf{I} + 16\mathbf{A}^{-1}) + 16\mathbf{A}

A5=12A3+16A2=12(12A+16I)+16(12I+16A−1)\mathbf{A}^5 = 12\mathbf{A}^3 + 16\mathbf{A}^2 = 12(12\mathbf{A} + 16\mathbf{I}) + 16(12\mathbf{I} + 16\mathbf{A}^{-1})

⋮\vdots

7.4 Engineering Application of Solving Homogeneous System of Linear Equations​

So far, we have determined the eigenvalue & eigenvector for a homogeneous system of linear equations. This information is useful to find the eigenfunction (i.e. Each of a set of independent functions which are the solutions to a given differential equation.)

2 mass spring system

Given stiffness, k=k1=k2=200 N/mk = k_1 = k_2 = 200\text{ N/m} ;

mass, m=m1=m2=40 kgm = m_1 = m_2 = 40\text{ kg}

The equations of motion of the 2 mass spring systems are provided:

−kx1−k(x1−x2)=m1x¨1-kx_1 - k(x_1 - x_2) = m_1\ddot{x}_1 k(x1−x2)−kx2=m2x¨2k(x_1 - x_2) - kx_2 = m_2\ddot{x}_2 where x1=A1sin⁡(ωt+θ1) ,x¨1=−ω2x1\text{where } x_1 = A_1\sin(\omega t + \theta_1) \ , \quad \ddot{x}_1 = -\omega^2x_1 x2=A2sin⁡(ωt+θ2) ,x¨2=−ω2x2x_2 = A_2\sin(\omega t + \theta_2) \ , \quad \ddot{x}_2 = -\omega^2x_2

[10−ω2−5−510−ω2]{x1x2}={00}\begin{bmatrix} 10 - \omega^2 & -5 \\ -5 & 10 - \omega^2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{Bmatrix}

Previously, solving the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem gives:

Eigenvalue: λ1=5;λ2=15\lambda_1 = 5; \lambda_2 = 15

(where ω1=λ1;ω2=λ2\omega_1 = \sqrt{\lambda_1}; \omega_2 = \sqrt{\lambda_2})

Eigenvector: {x1x2}1={11};{x1x2}2={1−1}\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix} ; \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix}

Note: Finding eigenfunction or the solution of homogeneous system of linear equations is out of scope and it is including here for your extra info.

Eigenfunction #1={x1x2}1sin⁡(λ1t+θ1)={11}sin⁡(5t+θ1)\text{Eigenfunction \#1} = \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_1 \sin(\sqrt{\lambda_1}t + \theta_1) = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)

Eigenfunction #2={x1x2}2sin⁡(λ2t+θ2)={1−1}sin⁡(15t+θ2)\text{Eigenfunction \#2} = \begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix}_2 \sin(\sqrt{\lambda_2}t + \theta_2) = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)

The total solution of the homogeneous linear algebraic system is equal to the superposition of all the eigenfunctions:

{x1x2}=c1{11}sin⁡(5t+θ1)+c2{1−1}sin⁡(15t+θ2)\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = c_1\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1) + c_2\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)

,where c1c_1 & c2c_2 are unknown constants that can be obtained from the initial or boundary conditions. You will learn it in the ODE chapter later.

Verification of eigenfunction as the solution to the equations:

−200x1−200(x1−x2)=40x¨1-200x_1 - 200(x_1 - x_2) = 40\ddot{x}_1 200(x1−x2)−200x2=40x¨2200(x_1 - x_2) - 200x_2 = 40\ddot{x}_2

Verification of eigenfunction #1: {x1x2}={11}sin⁡(5t+θ1)\begin{Bmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1) ; {x¨1x¨2}={−5−5}sin⁡(5t+θ1)\begin{Bmatrix} \ddot{x}_1 \\ \ddot{x}_2 \end{Bmatrix} = \begin{Bmatrix} -5 \\ -5 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)

Solution
LHSRHS
−200x1−200(x1−x2)-200x_1 - 200(x_1 - x_2)

=−200(sin⁡(5t+θ1))−200((sin⁡(5t+θ1))−(sin⁡(5t+θ1)))= -200(\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) - 200\left((\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) - (\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))\right)

=−200(sin⁡(5t+θ1))= -200(\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))
40x¨140\ddot{x}_1

=40(−5sin⁡(5t+θ1))= 40(-5\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))

=(−200sin⁡(5t+θ1))= (-200\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))
200(x1−x2)−200x2200(x_1 - x_2) - 200x_2

=200((sin⁡(5t+θ1))−(sin⁡(5t+θ1)))−200(sin⁡(5t+θ1))= 200\left((\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1)) - (\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))\right) - 200(\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))

=−200(sin⁡(5t+θ1))= -200(\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))
40x¨240\ddot{x}_2

=40(−5sin⁡(5t+θ1))= 40(-5\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))

=(−200sin⁡(5t+θ1))= (-200\sin(\sqrt{5}t + \theta_1))

∴\therefore Since LHS=RHSLHS = RHS, thus it is proven that eigenfunction #1 is one of the solution

Verification of eigenfunction #2: {1−1}sin⁡(15t+θ2)\begin{Bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2) ; {−1515}sin⁡(15t+θ2)\begin{Bmatrix} -15 \\ 15 \end{Bmatrix}\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)

Solution
LHSRHS
−200x1−200(x1−x2)-200x_1 - 200(x_1 - x_2)

=−200(sin⁡(15t+θ2))−200((sin⁡(15t+θ2))−(−sin⁡(15t+θ2)))= -200(\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) - 200\left((\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) - (-\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))\right)

=−600(sin⁡(15t+θ2))= -600(\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))
40x¨140\ddot{x}_1

=40(−15sin⁡(15t+θ2))= 40(-15\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))

=(−600sin⁡(15t+θ2))= (-600\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))
200(x1−x2)−200x2200(x_1 - x_2) - 200x_2

=200((sin⁡(15t+θ2))−(−sin⁡(15t+θ2)))−200(−sin⁡(15t+θ2))= 200\left((\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2)) - (-\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))\right) - 200(-\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))

=600(sin⁡(15t+θ2))= 600(\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))
40x¨240\ddot{x}_2

=40(15sin⁡(15t+θ2))= 40(15\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))

=(600sin⁡(15t+θ2))= (600\sin(\sqrt{15}t + \theta_2))

∴\therefore Since LHS=RHSLHS = RHS, thus it is proven that eigenfunction #2 is one of the solution